The West Memphis Three Hoax
User Info
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 08, 2010, 11:58:38 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Forum Stats
78334 Posts in 6920 Topics by 699 Members
Latest Member: ric2pd
* Home Help Login Register
The West Memphis Three Hoax  |  Case Discussion  |  The Legalities  |  Judge denies new trial « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Judge denies new trial  (Read 162 times)
Mary7875
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1167


« on: January 20, 2010, 10:50:19 AM »

http://www.wmctv.com/Global/story.asp?S=11851110

No new trial in West Memphis 3 killings
Posted: Jan 20, 2010 10:17 AM Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:17 AM EST Updated: Jan 20, 2010 10:58 AM Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:58 AM EST

JONESBORO, AR (WMC-TV) – The two men convicted of killing three West Memphis boys will not receive a new trial.

Judge David Burnett turned in his ruling Wednesday morning at the Craighead County Courthouse.
Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelly are both serving life sentences for the 1993 killing of three West Memphis boys. The two men claimed they received inadequate counsel during their trial previous trial and requested a new trial.

The men and their attorneys claimed new DNA evidence not available in 1993 helped prove their innocence.

   •   Click here to read Balwin's denial
   •   Click here to read Misskelly's denial (coming soon)

Stay with Action News 5 and WMCTV.com for updates on this story.  We'll have the latest today on Action News 5 at Noon.
Logged
kerriew
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Gender: Female
Posts: 3189


« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2010, 11:28:54 AM »

HAHA Read page 12 of Jason's
Logged
Mary7875
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1167


« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2010, 03:46:47 PM »

HAHA Read page 12 of Jason's


The Court concludes that counsel was hardly deficient for not pursuing a sideshow about post-mortem animal predation, any more than the counsel of his co-defendant Echols was as to human bite marks.

Two comments:

1.  Sideshow.  LMAO!
2.  Do supporters honestly believe that there's a judge in this country who would take the turtles seriously?  It just boggles the mind. 
Logged
FishmongerDave
Dweeb
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45

Seeker

« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2010, 11:21:35 PM »

HAHA Read page 12 of Jason's


The Court concludes that counsel was hardly deficient for not pursuing a sideshow about post-mortem animal predation, any more than the counsel of his co-defendant Echols was as to human bite marks.

Two comments:

1.  Sideshow.  LMAO!
2.  Do supporters honestly believe that there's a judge in this country who would take the turtles seriously?  It just boggles the mind.



Mary - go research the issue.  At least Google it a bit - animal predation and turtles post mortum ... check it out a bit..... yeah, you might say "a judge" (LOL) has taken it seriously; just a judge with what Burnett lacks - integrity, lack of pride and a positive IQ.  What's ridiculous is if any supporters thought this backwards country stupid redneck 1/2 politician / 1/2 "play judge" ... He was actually going to do his job??  ROFLMAO!!  That's where the humor is.

But, on animal predation, including but not limited to turtles, raccoons, dogs, and other carnivores in the area ... and what they do to bodies... - Google it a bit -- look around.  See for yourself.   .....  or don't -- if seeing wounds that will look VERY VERY familiar to anyone whose seen th4e autopsy photos of the boys ....  might be better not to look; keep your head in your..., oh I mean keep your head in the sand.
'

Logged
Farm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5653


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2010, 11:30:00 PM »

That's where the humor is.

I've seen your CV, and I've seen Burnetts.

YOU are where the humor is.

oh I mean keep your head in the sand.

Apparently this won't prevent turtles and scuba diving dogs from biting your face?
Logged

Release the REAL West Memphis Three: Sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride.
Kimbo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2328


lex talionis

« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2010, 11:32:03 PM »

"Google it"?

Dave you are seriously riding the short bus.

Tell me what animals went where... you got a whole list there cowboy.

Maybe that's why Burnett saw it as ridiculous as anyone would with a working brain....

Oh OK - you're excused.
Logged

Give me convenience or give me death
TJM
Ima Clownaphobic !! :(
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4789


Welky to the US where killers are known as victims

WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2010, 11:47:44 PM »

HAHA Read page 12 of Jason's


The Court concludes that counsel was hardly deficient for not pursuing a sideshow about post-mortem animal predation, any more than the counsel of his co-defendant Echols was as to human bite marks.

Two comments:

1.  Sideshow.  LMAO!
2.  Do supporters honestly believe that there's a judge in this country who would take the turtles seriously?  It just boggles the mind.



Mary - go research the issue.  At least Google it a bit - animal predation and turtles post mortum ... check it out a bit..... yeah, you might say "a judge" (LOL) has taken it seriously; just a judge with what Burnett lacks - integrity, lack of pride and a positive IQ.  What's ridiculous is if any supporters thought this backwards country stupid redneck 1/2 politician / 1/2 "play judge" ... He was actually going to do his job??  ROFLMAO!!  That's where the humor is.

But, on animal predation, including but not limited to turtles, raccoons, dogs, and other carnivores in the area ... and what they do to bodies... - Google it a bit -- look around.  See for yourself.   .....  or don't -- if seeing wounds that will look VERY VERY familiar to anyone whose seen th4e autopsy photos of the boys ....  might be better not to look; keep your head in your..., oh I mean keep your head in the sand.
'


Off topic here again:

I have a very strong feeling that someday you are going to slap the shit out of yourself and say "Damn Dave, I wish I hadn't ran my ignorant mouth like I did" 

Just sayin'..................... :D
Logged

I kind of enjoy it because now even after I die people are going to remember me forever. They're going to talk about me for years, People in West Memphis will tell their kids stories. It will be like, sort of like I'm the West Memphis boogeyman. Little kids will be looking under their beds~Damien E.
Mary7875
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1167


« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2010, 12:55:48 AM »


At least Google it a bit - animal predation and turtles post mortum


It's post-mortem, Dave, but I'm sure you know that.  You're a lawyer, so it must have been a Jack Daniels typo.

yeah, you might say "a judge" (LOL) has taken it seriously


Actually, I said that NO judge in this country would take the turtle predation seriously.  They haven't, and they won't.  It's absurd, and not just legally.  It's common-sense absurd.

But, on animal predation, including but not limited to turtles, raccoons, dogs, and other carnivores in the area


Yeah, we know.  Spitz has those wild dogs flinging the boys against hard places after they're dead.  Just playin' around with dead bodies for sport.  A little canine competition.

Go to bed, Dave.  It will all be ok in the morning, except for one thing:  you'll still be in New Jersey :)





 









 

Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
 

Powered by SMF 2.0 RC2 | SMF © 2006–2009, Simple Machines LLC | Theme by nesianstyles | Buttons by Andrea