Right! I forgot that you all believe that three teenagers somehow were so dang smart that they committed these crimes and left no DNA or took no DNA. BRILLIANT! Wow! Those are some crafty teenagers! Common sense.Since we also know that not all of the evidence collected has been tested for DNA….some of it could possibly belong to the three convicted, so……But anyway….I am so tired of hearing people say this. I have to ask……if there is no DNA from the convicted why the hell is that so hard to believe??? I mean, first of all, the most damaging thing to DNA is water…and the children were submerged in water. Second…..these were small children. I’m sure they were no match what-so-ever to these three teenagers so I’m sure that they were not able to put up much of a fight - if any at all. So, where you’d typically find skin underneath the nails of the victims from fighting back and things like that, I’m sure in this case there was none because those little boys couldn’t defend themselves. They were overpowered….they probably never got an opportunity to scratch, bite or do anything. So why the hell is that so shocking….I mean, c’mon..it’s COMMON SENSE!!
I thienk Constipation, constipated himself with that statement. Jesus how stupid can you get....